A Dozen Businesses Sued for ADA Non-Compliance

This is an archived article and the information in the article may be outdated. Please look at the time stamp on the story to see when it was last updated.

SACRAMENTIO-

More than a dozen shops and restaurants in the South Hill Strip Mall could go out of business because of a lawsuit that says they’re not compliant with the Americans With Disabilities Act.

“The whole mall, he got everybody,” Clair Brown said. Brown owns a bar called Brownie’s. He and almost every other owner in the shopping center were hit with a lawsuit from Scott Johnson, the quadriplegic lawyer who has thousands of similar lawsuits under his belt. “I’ve never seen him, he’s never been in here,” said Brown.

“It would probably cost $20,000 dollars [to comply],” says Brown. “I don’t have that money.”

The papers on Brown’s bar counter state Brownie’s violates 28 ADA regulations.

A few doors down, a flower shop has a similar situation. Next door, a salon, the same thing.

“You can’t just go into businesses and start suing people” said Cathie Garcia, the salon owner. She told FOX40 Johnson came by a few weeks ago to buy a gift certificate, and asked to use the bathroom.

“He didn’t ask us to even help him,” she told FOX40. “All of us will be out of business, for sure, there’s no other choice.”

The choices: pay up and comply, fight the lawsuit, or go out of business.

“There’s no doubt that this is a legal loop hole,” said Congressman Dan Lungren, (R-Sacramento).

Lungren proposed a bill that would at least give business owners more time to comply.

“There’s been an abuse of the law, litigation after litigation,” Lungren told FOX40. Any of the owners in the South Hill Strip Mall told FOX40 they were never told they needed to comply with ADA regulations.

“When you get a business license, you should be handed the law right then,” said Garcia.

But, the city says business owners are responsible for complying, whether they were told or not. “I hate to see the legal system, threatened, as a way of accomplishing a goal,” said Lungren.

FOX40 has not yet heard back from Scott Johnson but in the past, he has called himself a crusader for the disabled.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

4 comments

  • Randy

    What about Scott Johnson being sued by 4 former employes for sexual crimes and illegal lawsuits. Why have you not ran that story?

  • Darren McKinney

    Why is a small floral shop allowing any member of the public to use its presumably small, intended-for-employees bathroom? Surely California law cannot require every retail outlet, regardless of size and sales, to provide bathroom facilities for every Tom, Dick and Harry who rolls in off the streets. For small restaurants the issue is trickier, of course, but staff at small retailers should be schooled in politely explaining to incontinent customers and non-customers that, since the private bathroom also serves as storage for employees personal items, it must thus be kept off-limits to the public.

    -Darren McKinney, American Tort Reform Association

  • George

    I'am so tired of reading about some dumb A$$ that files a claimor lawsuit for the disabled I have several handycaps so called cant sit stand walk plus have a brain injury and I havent seen one cent or dime from these lawsuits its just like when the goverment charges some one for overcharging a customer the one thats overcharged never get the money its the goverment stop the lawsuits get a real job let some one keep theirs or their bus sorry if I spelled any incorrect but the brain injury caused me to lose that part of my ability