The $100,000 Technology that Could Have Found the Missing Malaysia Flight

This is an archived article and the information in the article may be outdated. Please look at the time stamp on the story to see when it was last updated.
Malaysia Missing Jetliner MH370

Two young girls leave messages and well wishes on the walls of Kuala Lumpur International Airport (March 13) for those on board the missing Malaysia Airlines jetliner MH370.
Photo by CNN’s Mark Phillips.


When Malaysia Airlines Flight 370 disappeared two weeks ago, evidence about what went wrong vanished with it. Any answers are likely trapped in the flight data recorder.

The Latest on the Search for MH370

But in a time when we stream Netflix on our laptops, get music instantly on our phones, and use Wi-Fi on our airplanes, why can’t we get that data in real time?

The technology already exists.

READ: Australian Leaders Say Objects Found During Search for Missing Plane

Canadian company Flyht Aerospace Solutions makes the Automated Flight Information System, or AFIRS, which automatically monitors data such as location, altitude, and performance.

And it can live stream information when something goes wrong. Flyht director Richard Hayden contends that we would have more answers today if that technology had been on Flight 370.

READ: Investigators Confirm Missing Malaysian Airlines Flight 370 Hijacked

“We would know where the aircraft has gone, where it is, and we would have information on what had happened in the meantime,” he said.

On a normal flight, the system would send updates every five to 10 minutes. It can be programmed to recognize when something is wrong, such as a deviation in flight path, and automatically begin streaming second-by-second data.

The main objection to this type of live-streaming has been cost, but Hayden says AFIRS is designed to save carriers money.

READ: New Evidence Strengthens Argument Missing Flight took Sharp Turn

“A typical installation would be under $100,000 including the box and the installation parts and the labor,” said Hayden. “Normally our customers recover that expense in a matter of months to, at most, a couple of years by virtue of the savings it creates.”

Those savings come from the ability to troubleshoot mechanical problems while the plane is in the air, he says, as well as collect data that can help cut fuels costs by tracking a plane’s performance under different conditions.

“Typically we’ll save three or four percent of an operator’s entire fuel budget,” said Hayden.

The potential benefits of live-streaming data were widely discussed after Air France Flight 447 crashed into the Atlantic Ocean in 2009. It took experts two years to recover the flight data recorder.

Take 5 Minutes, Help Find Missing Malaysia Flight 370

That’s because once a plane sinks to the bottom of the ocean, the flight data recorder goes with it. Ultrasonic “pingers” designed to lead searchers to the box have a radius of two miles, and the recorder’s batteries die after 30 days.

Still, former Inspector General of the Department of Transportation Mary Schiavo says carriers won’t get on board with live streaming technology unless they have to.

“[Airlines are] very cost sensitive. They simply will not add additional safety measures unless mandated by the Federal Government,” said Schiavo.

By Logan Whiteside and Bronte Lord 

™ & © 2014 Cable News Network, Inc., a Time Warner Company. All rights reserved

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s